with Purpose
EN PT-BR

Contribute

Open to read. Curated to publish.

Pilot phase · invited educators

We will begin across higher-education fields, test the editorial process, learn from practice, and only then broaden the call to the public.

How it works

Authors remain part of every decision about their text.

There is no automatic publishing. Editorial dialogue helps clarify the argument without erasing the author’s voice or responsibility.

  1. 01Proposal

    A question, experience, or argument connected to the project’s purpose.

  2. 02Editorial conversation

    A review of fit, sources, limits, clarity, and possible revisions.

  3. 03Author approval

    No text is published without the final agreement of the person who signs it.

  4. 04Publication and dialogue

    The text receives a byline, date, and room for evidence-based editorial responses.

Editorial & Contribution Policy

Simple criteria that protect quality and dialogue.

The full policy remains concise and may evolve after the pilot. Material changes will be recorded transparently.

01

Purpose before visibility

We publish what helps people understand AI and its human consequences—not what merely attracts attention.

02

Fact, inference, and judgment

The text should help readers distinguish evidence, interpretation, and the author’s position.

03

Human authorship

AI may support the work, but the author verifies the content, discloses material use, and remains responsible for the final text.

04

Respect and privacy

We do not publish personal attacks, plagiarism, confidential information, or identifiable people without appropriate permission.

05

Editorial transparency

Publication follows conversation, revision, and the author’s final approval. Material corrections remain visible.

06

Independence

Participation does not imply endorsement by an author’s institution. AI with Purpose remains an independent initiative.

Author rights

Authors retain copyright and grant non-exclusive permission to publish. Translations and substantial changes require their approval.

Prepare a proposal

Begin with a strong question, not a perfect manuscript.

An initial proposal can be brief. It helps establish fit before asking anyone to complete a full article.

Include, when possible:

  • a working title and professional field;
  • the central question or experience;
  • the main argument and its limitations;
  • evidence, examples, or references;
  • the connection to education, work, or human agency;
  • any use of AI during preparation;
  • a short author biography.

During the pilot: the form below prepares the proposal but does not send it automatically. After copying or downloading the content, the author sends it through the channel named in the invitation.

Editorial pilot

Proposal form

Provide only what is needed to begin an editorial conversation. You can copy or download the proposal and send it through the channel named in your invitation.

Fields marked with * are required.

Independence note

The project may begin in dialogue with UAM educators, but it is not presented as an official university initiative. Institutional affiliations contextualize authors’ work unless a formal agreement is established later.

View the first editorial call